Short Essay – Two Children are NOT Enough

Radical, second-wave feminism convinced women decades ago, that having a career was more important than being “dominated and oppressed” by “male chauvinist pigs” through marriage.

two kids and parents

So, when remaining single no longer appealed to women, those with the guts to buck the sisterhood and marry, were forced to limit the number of children they had, in order to continue to handle their “liberating” careers.

The herculean effort it took to balance the demands of both job and family, led to fewer and fewer children. Two children became the optimum number, for working mothers and, one of each sex was considered ideal.

This severely limited number of children is unnatural. Historically, women have always had many more children and there is no evidence that they didn’t love each and every one of them. Limiting a family to two children has caused tons of societal problems too. And the damning results of this feminist assault on children is reflected in the statistics showing that Americans are now having so few children that there is a serious concern that Western Civilization may not survive, not to mention, enough cash for Social Security or Medicare provided by the younger workers, who do not exist.two children

White, middle class, women are the worst offenders because they absorbed radical feminism into their very bones. More than any other group in America, they have restricted the number of children they gave birth to, in order to pursue pointless “careers”. America has kept its birthrate just above 2 only because of our Hispanic population. And although Hispanics make our birthrate stats appear better than that of the Western European countries (where they have dropped to unrecoverable levels), the Hispanic culture did not make America the “shining city on the hill.” The WASP’s (White, Anglo-Saxon, Protestant) did. They are responsible for the first 200 years of America’s glorious history and its unprecedented prosperity.

Today, after nearly 50 years of radical, second-wave feminism’s destructive influence over women, those very same WASP’s are watching their population numbers plummet. And white people are in rapid decline globally because their women are following the prescribed route to fewer children, as directed by radical feminism. They are having just two, politically correct (another creation of radical, second-wave feminism), children. If we are to survive as a culture, this has got to STOP!

Radical, Second-Wave Feminism Career? - YES! Marriage and Motherhood? - NO WAY! Dumb? - ABSOLUTELY!

Radical, Second-Wave Feminism
Career? – YES!
Marriage and Motherhood? – NO WAY!
Dumb? – ABSOLUTELY!

This nonsense began when radical, second-wave feminists rejected motherhood as a viable life choice for women in the late 1960s and early 1970s. This left “career” women in a quandary about having children, while their biological clocks kept ticking away. If they did dare to marry and then, OMG, have kids, it was limited to two because two could be molded to fit within the mother’s demanding work schedule.

Their births were planned. Their childcare was scheduled. Their play dates were organized. Their activities were coordinated. Their little lives were run like a business. Everything was planned around the mother’s rigorous work schedule. Oh, what fun! NOT!

Sadly, as a result, the kids became just another obligation in the stress-filled life of a “career” woman while she wasted her youth and her energy, tied to a “career” that would never adequately replace the years she missed with her children. Eventually, the “career” would be gone, along with her children, leaving nothing in their wake but burned-out loneliness filled with regrets. It would prove to be a selfish, pointless life and an enormous feminist scam.

And so, with a desperate need to organize her life to succeed at both career and motherhood, the liberated feminist became obsessed with her two children’s lives, expecting constant conformity to her schedules, and full cooperation with her demands. Women with only one or two children focus-in too closely on their children, smothering their independence and curiosity, as she strives to control everything.

Every decision is made for the children in their sanitized world, during every minute of the day. Children become robots, shuttled from one commitment to another. No wonder today’s young adults have so much trouble with responsibility. While kids, they were never given the ability to develop those skills. There wasn’t anyone with the time to show them what “responsibility” encompassed. Mom always did everything for them, rather than with them, in an effort to get out the door on time for the next commitment. There just wasn’t any time to wait around, while they learned.

Only having two kids allowed this chaotic situation to exist. Having just one or two additional children would have alleviated all of this ridiculousness because there would be too much to do at home, for a mother to even consider working outside her home. And, despite what the miserable feminists have told you, everyone (including Mom) would have been happier, if she were at home. There would be time to love and to teach her children what’s really important in life – responsibility, kindness, integrity, compassion, respect, character, happiness, table manners, faith and family. While working full-time there is none.

mom with new baby and lots of kids

Everyone sure looks miserable. NOT!

Just one generation ago American Christian families routinely had 4,5,6,7, 8 or more kids. It’s much easier to “chill-out” about their future when there are so many kids to live vicariously through. The Irish have an old joke about the large families they used to have. It goes, “If you have 10 kids, one will be a priest, one will be a nun and one will be a crook.” It’s easier to accept the “disappointment” of one or two children, when there are 8 more to be proud of, thus removing the magnifying glass from their individual lives and letting them blossom individually.

white family with 8 kids

One, big, Unhappy family. NOT!

ten kids

Parents regretted the births of numbers 3 and 7. NOT!

Unfortunately, today, neither our kids, nor their parents have that luxury because everything is dependent on so few children.

So, rather than marry the guy she loves and stay home with the 6 kids she loves, the brainwashed, liberated, “career” feminist gives birth to the 2 prescribed children and hysterically dives head-long into her “career” instead, dragging her 2 overwrought kids, kicking and screaming, behind her.

Despite what radical, second-wave feminism has told you, no one has ever regretted having too many children, but be assured, there are millions of “liberated” career women who regret not having had more.

The End  

It’s the Women, Not the Men!

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Short Essay – Two Children are NOT Enough

  1. In Indonesia, several of it’s people believe alongside improved education, we must reduce our kids (I mean limiting the number of kids a family have) to reduce juvenile delinquency who were rife nationwide particularly street fighting or we called in Indonesia as the “Tawuran”,

    Is that a solution?

    Like

    • Better parenting! Especially fathering. Despite feminism’s assertion that raising children can be done successfully by mothers ONLY. That is a LIE. Mothers can raise children successfully ONLY until they are 7 for boys and 10 for girls. Beyond those ages, children NEED the stern discipline that can be ONLY be issued from their male father. This discipline keeps the daughters safe from sexual involvement at too young an age because their fathers stands between their daughters and any guy who wants to “date” her. That guy knows he has to deal with her father FIRST. And for the sons, fathers, unlike mothers, Dads know exactly what their boys are thinking and where they may make bad mistakes because they are male and were once that age too. As a result, the BIGGER male in the family, Dad, can put at stop to it before it becomes a real problem, even if he has to resort to corporal punishment in order to straighten his son out and save him from his youthful impulses. There isn’t a government agency on earth that can accomplish what ONE father can do for his sons future!

      Like

      • Fully agree with you ma’am, but you might miss my point a bit. Is limiting children a family have a good solution to the street fighting problems?

        Like

      • Of course not! The answer is to encourage the adoption of the caring tenets of Christianity in very young boys, through public education policy changes, is the key to controlling their naturally rambunctious, impetuous, and mischievous behavior. Of course, returning the positive disciplinary influence of Christian fathers (which 50 years of radical feminism has destroyed) to their male children is also essential to containing, restraining and positively redirecting young boys and men’s behavior. Christian male mentoring of boys through the influence of radical feminism is a serious, serious loss to boys and young men. Mothers, and women in general, need to step back and allow Christian men and boys bond on their own terms. So, limiting the number of children born to Christian parents will only diminish Christianity’s influence in your culture due to FEWER living Christians. The muslims are already out-pacing Christians with regards to the number of children born to couples thanks to Western Civilization’s substitution of the “career-oriented”, anti-children, anti-Christian ideology of radical, second-wave feminism for the tenets of their former Christian faith. That shift in population has proved calamitous for both Christianity and Christians, as we are becoming less influential politically, while muslims become more influential simply due to their vast population numbers.

        Like

      • Agreed but you might forgot that in context of mine, Indonesia is muslim majority even since our independence in 1945.

        Like

  2. I just had my sixth! A baby girl named Gabrielle. I find great encouragement from your work. I wish you would elaborate more on the stay at home heaven type articles or offer more on how to make Home more homey. I stay home and plan to remain this way, however we are feeling the financial pinch . Would you say a prayer for favor in the work department for my husband please? Thank you. by the way I love this article, and wish I was bold enough to tell women these things straight up with no qualms. I think you may have grown older and bolder or were you always so straight forward? What gives you the passion and guts to say these things? Is it your faith? Love T.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Congratulations! And, of course I will pray for your husband’s success at work. He should seek out a local company through your church that is run by an avid Christian, or a national company, like Hobby Lobby or Chic Fil A, as these owners are very supportive of their Christian employees and their priorities in life (children).
      To your other inquiry, I’ve always, from a very young girl, been straight forward about what’s right and wrong but have only recently found great courage, elicited from my strong belief in God and His teachings, to go beyond my circle of influence. I want as many people as possible to avoid evil, and therefore sinful, behavior. Behavior that will lead them to hell (in particular, the ideology of radical, feminism) and at the same time, encourage others to follow Jesus to Heaven, by instead embracing the joy attained through the high standards of behavior as defined by Christianity.
      So many young American people are clueless about the ways of their ancestor’s Christian faith because it has been systematically denied to them by, ironically, very influential Catholics in the judiciary (especially the U. S. Supreme Court), who, decades ago, decided to choose liberalism (feminism) as their New Age faith while abandoning their Christian faith. Their deliberate betrayal of future generations of Americans has had a profoundly negative effect on this country, but especially on those who are too young to remember how idyllic Christian America was in the 1950s and before. And yes, I’m older. So old that I actually remember when these influential people betrayed us. So, my goal is to educate these same young people, especially the men, to find a REAL purpose for their lives, and take up the cloth of Christ, defend His teachings in their daily lives and reclaim America for Him. It’s only through the rebirth, and encouragement, of the emotional, spiritual and physical strength of Christian men that we, as a Christian culture, will survive the vicious attacks inflicted on it during the last 50 years, by those who embrace socialist/liberalism/feminism’s horrific advocacy for evil in America. God bless your husband, you and your precious new baby! 🙂

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s