Short Essay – Why Does America Hate Children?

My life's a mess. Nobody cares about me.

My life’s a mess because America doesn’t care about me.

Is there anyone who can say, with a straight face, that Americans love children? Is there a woman out there who believes that Americans are doing their level best to raise children to become productive and happy adults? Is there a man in this country, who can take pride in the results of America’s child-rearing efforts? Can anyone stand up in a crowd and say that our children are as safe, and as secure, as they once were?

Does ANYONE truly believe that America LOVES its children, because if they do, the empirical evidence proves them to be absolutely WRONG!

Our kids are a mess, both emotionally, physically and spiritually. And our “elitist”  judicial, and political, “leaders” are to blame because they are in lock-step with radical, second-wave feminism’s, anti-children, ideology.

America took its first giant step towards abandoning its children, in 1964, when the U. S. Supreme Court banned school prayer in our public schools. Public schools which were  filled to the brim (99%) with little, Christian children, most of whom were Protestant.

These children, and their parents, were indeed the “public”, and the public schools reflected their priorities and their 200 year old educational traditions.

Atheist, Madalyn Murray O'Hair

Atheist Madalyn Murray O’Hair (1919-1995)

The 1963 U. S. Supreme Court case, which ultimately banned school prayer, was called “Murray vs. Curlett”.

You can read all about this notorious case by clicking on my link to my post – Abyss of Abortion Vol. #1 Essay 1.

In short, the outcome of the Murray vs. Curlett case, in conjunction with other similar cases, was the betrayal of the century for little children. 

This case was the result of the recently liberalized U. S. Supreme Court, “led” by the powerful, Catholic, Justice William Brennan, Jr.

Brennan was on the bench for 34 years, from 1956 to 1990!

During Brennan’s destructive decades on the bench, he spread his leftist, anti-Christian, liberal ideology, far and wide!

The reprehensible case concerning school prayer was brought by a psychotic, radical, second-wave feminist, and atheist, named Madalyn Murray O’Hair. Her case was presented to Brennan’s court by her non-Christian lawyer, Leonard Kerpelman.

Kerpelman would prove to be just as deplorable individual as his client. He was eventually disbarred, and went to jail, for bilking a client.

This highly compromised twosome, brought the case before the U. S. Supreme Court in the name of O’Hair’s, supposedly atheist, illegitimate 13-year-old son, Bill.  

To this very day, it continues to astound me that the court ruled to wipe out the protective grace of prayer for millions of young, vulnerable, Christian school children, in favor, of ONE, supposedly atheist, kid!

If you know your American history you realize that the use of the  “separation of church and state” clause, upon which the justices

U. S. Constitution

U. S. Constitution

based their decision, was far-fetched and preposterous!

Their interpretation was the antithesis of what the Founding Fathers had in mind when they included that clause in the U. S. Constitution in 1788.

This U. S. Supreme Court ruling made no sense. Why did the court go so far out-on-a-limb to agree with these two weirdos?

Was there a conspiracy afoot among the recently appointed, left-leaning elitists on the Supreme Court at the time?

Looking at the results of this unprecedented decision, my answer would have to be, “Yes!”

The decision was intentional, calculating and extremely short-sighted. As the proverb says, “The road to Hell is paved with good intentions”, because  we are now living, in a supposedly Christian country, run by atheists.

O’Hair’s son, Bill Murray, profoundly regretted being used as a pawn by his selfish, narcissistic mother and eventually became a Christian, and then a pastor, during the 1980s.

Pastor Murray spent a good part of his adult life, pursuing his infamous mother around on the lecture circuit, trying to offset the damage she was doing to Christianity.

The television industry, which was in infancy, followed her everywhere too.

Unfortunately, this intense media attention gave O’Hair’s bizarre rants, some form of legitimacy.

The company O’Hair kept finally caught up with her when she, another son and her granddaughter were all murdered by one of her former employees in 1995. “What comes around, goes around.”

No Praying

Thou Shalt Not Pray!

The Murray vs. Curlett case was the beginning of the end of Christianity’s positive influence on the lives of little American children. The same Christian children who, for centuries, had been reared under the protection and grace of God, to become honor-bound, trustworthy adults. Adults who became respectable businessmen, workers, leaders, neighbors, teachers, neighbors, teachers, entrepreneurs, politicians, doctors, lawyers, and more importantly husbands, fathers, wives and mothers. Christian adults who would continue to provide America with outstanding Christian children of their own.

The fact that most people never locked the doors to their homes prior to 1963, spoke volumes to the security and safety that the Christian faith had provided to American communities across the nation. 

This was an America protected by Christian men, which is in direct contrast with today’s America, which is instead being driven, and attacked, by radical, second-wave, atheist feminists.

The removal of school prayer was the first step in the abandonment of our Christian children. As it would be shown, it would prove to be just the tip of the iceberg.

I couldn’t bring myself to include “abortion photos” but, legalizing abortion was next. The disgusting, debasing and sick process of abortion would prove to be the next betrayal of our little, innocent children, as radical, second-wave feminism continued to wash over the college campus’. Abortion was legalized in 1973 by the same liberalized, left-wing U. S. Supreme Court, “led” by the same Justice William Brennan, Jr.!

Attorney Sarah Weddington

Attorney Sarah Weddington

Roe vs. Wade, was brought by another radical, second-wave feminist, whose alias was Jane Roe.

Roe was single, 21, pregnant for the third time, by a third man. The case was presented before the court by two more radical, second-wave feminists, attorneys Linda Coffee, 28 and Sarah Weddington, 26 (who secretly aborted her child in Mexico in 1967 in order to continue to pursue her law degree).

Neither of these young women had ever before argued a contested case in their very short careers.

How could it be that these inexperienced, very young, female lawyers were to be heard before the highest court in the land?

Was there another conspiracy afoot? Another secretive, behind-the-scenes attempt to shatter Christian America at its roots?

Again, my answer is, “Yes!” The facts show that this radical court, headed by Chief Justice Earl Warren, was “looking” for plaintiffs to bring cases of this sort before their court. Cases which were based on radical, second-wave feminist ideology.

And they found plenty of disgruntled takers.

Jane Roe, who was in fact, a woman named Norma McCorvey, was to also regret her involvement with the Roe vs. Wade case, just as Bill Murray had come to regret his involvement with the Murray vs. Curlett case.

McCorvey also lamented at being used as a pawn by her two radical, second-wave feminist lawyers. Norma, who never actually had the abortion her lawyers sought, was so intensely pressured by her lawyers to get an abortion, that she finally went into hiding to escape them. It wasn’t until four years later that she learned the vile outcome of her court case. Norma was baptized a Christian in 1995 and has spent the remainder of her life as a pro-life activist.

Once legalized abortion became the law of the land, it became nearly impossible to insist that the citizenry maintain good Christian standards of behavior. How could anyone, with a straight face, insist that Americans refrain from cheating, lying, stealing, etc., when the deliberate and violent destruction of a teeny baby, asleep in its mother’s womb, was permitted? How could the authorities insist that people comply with the remainder of the rules without leaving themselves open to being accused of being a hypocrite?!!! Nearly every other infraction of the law paled in comparison to abortion. 

The Infamous Timothy Leary

The Infamous Timothy Leary (1920-1996)

And so, as the laws continued to be brought into alignment with the wants of radical, second-wave feminism’s demands, constrained personal behavior disappeared.

As another, notoriously compromised weirdo of the 1960s, the psychedelic LSD guru “Professor” Timothy Leary (who was abandoned by his father at 13) from University of California at Berkeley (the hot bed of anarchy during 1960s), once advised, “You must turn on, tune in and drop out.” With this insanity running amok in America was it any surprise that America’s, young baby boomers in particular, were left rudderless, in a maelstrom of deceit, debauchery and decay.

This predicated the total abandonment of America’s little children, as every traditional safety net provided by the tenets of Christianity was wiped away in the societal chaos left in its wake.

For women of the “Me” generation, the self-centered, narcissistic, personal pursuits, defined by non-Christian, radical, second-wave feminism, including secularism, “career” and materialism were “In”, and traditional Christian marriage, family and children were “Out”. 

As more and more American women began to shift their allegiance away from traditional Christian marriage and motherhood, and towards, “career” and “independence”, children were viewed as less and less important to the “fulfillment” of their lives. Children were soon considered a “drag” on women’s illustrious “career” paths. And, in what seems like, no time at all, children literally fell off the public radar screen. Instead, radical, second-wave feminist “career” women took center stage in their place.

1970s Feminist Rally Poster - "Don't Cook Dinner, Starve a Rat" and "End Human Sacrifice, Don't Get Married."

By Abandoning Traditional Christian Marriage, in Favor of “Career”, Millions of Baby Boomers Abandoned Their Children As Well.

Incredibly, it was the women who publicly and loudly rejected and denounced the concept of family, marriage and children. It was the women who ultimately abandoned the children.

Today, it is obvious that the personally compromised feminist judges, both male and female, and the female political hacks who do their bidding, continue this unrelenting battle against children.

These are people who care NOTHING for children, just as their parents cared nothing for many of them. These hate-filled people have notoriously failed to legally protect children from the neglect and destruction to which they are routinely and innocently subjected, with legalized abortion at the top of the list!

And anyone who says that legalized abortion saves young women from back alley abortions has not followed the grizzly abortion case of the black, Dr. Kermit Gosnell, in Philadelphia!

Legalized abortion has done NOTHING to alleviate this nightmare. All its done is to allow those same back alley monsters to hang out their shingles out, in broad daylight!

Abortion is evil, whether done in secret or in public. The horrific results, for mother and child, remain the same.

neglected girl

No one loves me.

Our blessed children. Lesbian-led, non-Christian, radical, second-wave feminist women don’t want children, don’t need children in their lives, and don’t care for children. They don’t even embrace the concept of children as valuable entities. It’s purely and simply, “All about them!” and children do not fit the bill.

neglected children poster

That’s because no one loves them.

More unfortunately is the fact, that radical, second-wave feminism has side-lined, shouted-down and denigrated the Christian men who do love their children. And we, as a society, are ALL the poorer for it, but especially the little children. The same little children who are the victims of ghettos, child abuse, single-motherhood, divorced parents, illegitimacy, pedophilia, kiddie porn, crime and a legal system that deliberately strives to destroy their value to our nation’s future. 

Our children are now the innocent victims of the most heinous of crimes. Crimes never imagined, before radical, second-wave feminism’s ideology reared its ugly head and became the law of the land.

Unlike the non-Christian, lesbian-led, radical, second-wave feminists, our Christian men would rather have died for these children, than let them live in these hate-filled environments surrounded by horror, fear and neglect.

We can thank radical, second and third-wave feminism for the assault on our little children. Their twisted view of a world, that revolves around instant gratification, narcissism, egocentric self-centeredness and female self-satisfaction has left us a legacy of disgrace and destruction. They, and they alone, are responsible for the putrefaction of our culture and feminist’s abandonment of children is at the apex of their legacy.

Through their evil influence they have brought about the demise of Christian standards of behavior towards little children, as they pointlessly strive to “one-up” the men as “career” women instead.

neglected child

Mommy hurt me

These self-centered, egotistical women have embraced the denigration of precious children, through blind neglect. Women, who by their very nature, should love and value children above all else, are now radical feminists, and by association, they are supporting the destruction of little children’s bodies, hearts and souls. Their off-handed acceptance of the proliferation of evil deliberately targeted at children is disgusting!

neglected little girl

No one loves me

Our children are under assault by these twisted women, as they turn a “blind eye” towards the evil they have unleashed and, the collateral damage and unintended consequences they have permitted to occur, through abortion, pedophilia, abuse, divorce, neglect, murder, violent video games, atrocious TV, amoral cartoons, grizzly movies, recreational drugs, and infant day-care warehousing.

The radical, second and third-wave feminist’s twisted, anti-family priorities continue to be spread by the liberal media, judiciary and Women’s Studies professors across America because millions of women, by their deafening silence, permit it.

There are days when I am ASHAMED to define myself as an “American” woman.
Where once it implied the love and reverence associated with motherhood, it now implies the debauched and disease filth once only associated with psychopaths.

Our precious, innocent children deserve better! Women, it’s time to FIGHT BACK and speak-up in their defense!!

THE END. It’s the Women, Not the Men!

12 thoughts on “Short Essay – Why Does America Hate Children?

  1. Peace of mind is found by focusing on God, not money. So, no matter how little one has, as long as one trusts in God, one need not worry. Have you not read Mathew 6:24-34? Think about the Christians who live in poverty in the third world. They live each day, despite their circumstances. Are you saying they are less blessed, or do you “sympathise” with them for being in poverty? I can assure you that those who focus on God, instead of money, are very joyful, not matter how much suffering, because they focus on God, love God and do not love money.

    Loving money does not just simply mean to only want to buy luxury goods. It refers to any trust in money, instead of God.

    You see, you American Christians who live with so much money and so comfortably don’t seem to be able to understand this teaching. It seems so out of your mind for so many of you, because whether you realise it or not, many of you are proud of your money or wealth. That is why many of you do not take Jesus’ teaching on money seriously at all, if not despise it.


    • Yes. As Americans, we have been blessed with great “wealth”, as compared with the rest of the world, but to assume we are less Christian because of our “wealth” is insulting. I consider myself to be a VERY good Christian and my “wealth” is simply a tool to spread the Good News to others.


    • I’m not familiar with a “child free” movement. But if it encourages women to remain childless while pursing a “career” instead, it is another despicable attempt by the feminists to deny women the joy-filled role for which they were designed! A woman who remains single and childless will someday be old, lonely, poor and dependent on the soulless government for her care. Only a FOOL would deliberately plan that kind of future for herself.


      • Hi Mrs Duane

        May I please ask, what if she is not able to be married for whatever reason. Not all women who remain single choose it for a “career”. I think that there a nuance to what you have said in relation to a single childless woman. What if she is married but unable to have children.

        Would the Church not have to look after these people? Isn’t that’s why the Bible tells us to care for the needy?


      • Yes. Of course. But who better to care for her than her extended family? Old age comes to all of us, whether, as young people, we want to admit that fact or not. Without loving family members to help those women, their lives will become frightening and very nerve wracking. They will have to place their aged, infirm, fragile and confused bodies, and personal finances, into the hands of total strangers. I prefer to encourage marriage, rather than encourage singleness, for many, many reasons, but this is one of the more practical reasons – peace of mind in your old age.


      • I understand your good motives in encouraging marriage over singleness. I would encourage that too, for the purpose of promoting Christendom and going against feminist secularist modernist culture. It is good to have children, and I believe it is the role of women to have children, an obligation generally, just as Mr Shoebat from believes. My views on marriage, family and the role of women are influenced mainly by Mr Shoebat and Mr Larry Solomon, if not solely influenced by these two zealous Christian men, one being unmarried and the other being married.

        However, what I am really trying to get at is that God provides. Jesus told us not to be anxious about earthly needs and that it is pagans who are anxious about such things (Matthew 6:24-34). So, encouraging people to marry because of financial “security” and wealth I think is not Biblical as it shows a lack of faith in God to provide.

        I think rather marriage should be encouraged for the purpose of SANCTIFICATION of persons, and growing in CHRIST-LIKE LOVE, not earthly financial “security”, or sexual pleasure.


      • The word “wealth” is misleading. I’m simply restating the fact that married people have more money than those who don’t marry. I’m not encouraging ANYONE to be greedy. I’m just noting that fact. Money is not a bad thing unless it is viciously pursued at the expense of other people. But, if it arrives through honest hard work, which first, benefits a man’s family, and then, if by happenstance, expands beyond his family and benefits the man’s neighbors and community, then there is NOTHING wrong with that accumulation of money. American Christians have proven to be VERY generous with the money they earn through hard work. In fact, Christians are the most charitable people on earth. They are, and have been, exceedingly philanthropic. Most of America’s, now public, libraries, universities, concert halls, hospitals and fire departments were started by wealthy Christian businessmen, who manufactured something that other people needed. And they were rewarded with wealth, that they then returned to the very people who bought and paid for their manufactured goods, through their personal philanthropy to the community. There’s nothing WRONG with this. It’s ALL good.


      • I’m not saying there is something wrong with money. No one is saying that.What I am pointing out is that you seem to suggest that one reason why a person should marry is because of this earthly temporal benefit.

        You might not realise this, but many happily married Christians who live a comfortable life, think that single Christians are “missing out”, or “unsatisfied” because they are not married like you. In other words, many of you seem to be gloating about it, and think yourselves superior to unmarried people. Having more money than single people is why many of you are so smug, isn’t it?.Well you know, these thing all rot as the Bible says. It is only riches in Heaven that last forever.

        Also, in families where one person works, as I believe it should be, and where there are children, the wealth is distributed among the people. Compare that to a single people of the same income and no children or spouse. Don’t get me wrong, I am not encouraging people to be “careerist” and seeking a “career”, that is, an achievement-orientated pursuit in saying this.

        All I am saying is that many Christians, including married Christians are somewhat attached to money and don’t realise it. They are under the spirit of “mammon”, not content to have less money, but only wanting more than they already have, despite having much disposable income. I know the way many western Christians view money. They don’t realise it, but most of them trust in it to some extend, finding security in it. The thing is that Jesus said you cannot serve both God and mammon, which is exactly what many Christians in the west are trying to do.


      • If encouraging young people to do what I know, from experience, works well is “gloating” than you are doing the same by professing the faith to others. “Gloating” has nothing to do with wanting others to follow a proven, reasonable and balanced, path to happiness. Again, the FACT is that just being married causes people to be “wealthier” and that is a good thing for their children, family, neighbors and community. I don’t believe most people are “attached to money”, they are instead in NEED of money in today’s advanced world, since it is now required to buy bread, clothing and shelter for themselves and their families. To believe that you can do WITHOUT money is unrealistic and belies an irrational belief in utopia. So, unless you aspire to dedicate your life to God, the religious life and a vow of poverty or you want to become homeless, live under a bridge and beg for food, there is NO way to get along today without money. And again, there is nothing wrong with that, unless you allow your unfettered pursuit of money, through the cardinal sin of greed, to define your life instead.


      • Hi Mrs Duane

        I am not necessary saying that you are gloating, but rather that many married Christians in the west generally seem to be so smug about their wealth and the companionship they enjoy. They love to talk about how “blessed” they are, by which they mean that “I know you don’t have what I have”. I apologise if I made you feel that way about you.

        I am not denying the need for money. What I am saying is that Jesus said to seek first the Kingdom of God, and all these things, like food, shelter ,etc will be added to you (Matthew 6:30-34).

        Read Matthew 6:24-34.


      • I do, as do most other American Christians, seek Jesus FIRST. He is our inspiration, our leader, our all! Without Him we could not, and would not, succeed in life. And when we say we are “blessed” it has NOTHING to do with those who have LESS! It is said with sincere gratitude and humility. It has NOTHING to do with “shaming” others, or lauding what we have over others. I wish you would stop misjudging us! We are ALL Christians and should NOT second-guess each other’s motivations. There is enough true evil trying to destroy us without insulting and “assuming” erroneous things about each other! We do the best we can with what we are given, just as I hope you do.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.