Where have all the ladies gone? What happened to the Grace Kellys, the Nancy Reagans and the Audrey Hepburns of the world? How did women lose touch with their femininity? When did women decide to abandon the life goal of becoming a respected lady?
Who convinced women to denigrate marriage and motherhood, which had always been the source of women’s greatest joy and happiness? Why do women of today want to behave like men rather than like ladies? Who decided that being a lady wasn’t good enough?
The answer? Non-Christian radical, second-wave feminists!
Just as the old saying goes, “misery loves company. ” And, the ugly, non-Christian women finally found a way to induce millions of naive young, female baby boomers to their way of thinking, during the societal chaos of the late 1960s and early 1970s.
And, as a result, the radical, second-wave feminist founders were able to garner the attention they desperately craved, as emotionally deprived children from dysfunctional families.
To this end, they falsely claimed that all women were “oppressed” and “dominated” by “male chauvinist pigs,” when in fact their personal problems were self-imposed.
And, there wasn’t a lady in the bunch.
The term feminism is, in and of itself, an oxymoron, with the accent on moron. There is nothing feminine about this “ism.” In fact, the very goal of radical, second-wave feminism is the total annihilation of traditional femininity, replacing it with masculinity instead.
Radical, second-wave feminists ridicule Christian women of beauty, charm and grace because they simply cannot compete with them, on any level. They deliberately demean the very attributes that make ladies, ladies, in order to salve their bruised egos.
Unlike the strident, non-Christian feminists, Christian ladies are kind, polite, considerate, thoughtful, caring and joyful. It is a pleasure to be in their company and they inspire others, through their good behavior, to behave themselves as well.
Feminists deny that these fundamental elements of a successful marriage exist because this triumvirate (love, respect and trust) is something these radical feminists have never personally experienced and therefore do not, will not, or cannot comprehend them.
The traditional, rewarding and emotionally-binding personal relationship between a husband and wife, who love each other, is not considered a possibility within feminist dogma unless it relates to homosexuality, which is a very poor, and psychologically twisted, substitute for the real thing.
The famous radical feminists of the 1960s and 1970s had notoriously dysfunctional family lives. Familial love, in the traditional Christian sense, was never a part of their upbringing. Mentally ill fathers, or mothers, played a dramatic, and destructive, role in many of their childhoods.
As a result, these neglected children, of neglected children, were driven to distraction by any happy woman who loved her family and was deeply loved by her spouse, in return.
These loving relationships, inspired by the Holy Family, were the antithesis of the upbringings experienced by these non-Christian radical feminists. The only family experiences that they were familiar with, was the chronic crisis of living within a highly contentious, and totally dysfunctional, family defined by contempt rather than love. This, and only this, caused their unprecedented, and distorted, views of marriage and the
roles women played within it.
As a result, most radical feminist leaders from the 1960s and 1970s rejected the concept of marriage and they chose to never marry or soon divorce.
And, in their efforts to “liberate” themselves from their dysfunctional relationships, their natural tendency to be abrasive, was amplified.
Whatever shred of femininity that had ever existed within these women was eradicated by the aggressive process of making a life for themselves, alone.
And rather than calming their personal lives, this “emancipating” experience only made matters worse, as they jettisoned most forms of civility, in their irrational efforts to become “liberated” from their dysfunctional families and the community at large.
Once they had pried themselves “free” and were unfettered by familial restraints, they rebelled, and bitched, about everything, making demanding nuisances of themselves, rather than contributing anything positive to their community.
In other words, they became very difficult women to associate with. As a result, most men turned a deaf ear towards them but that was not the case with the TV industry, which was in its infancy.
As a result of their “liberated” attitudes, their lives began to spin out of control, and their bizarre public behavior began to catch the media’s attention.
This downward spiral eventually took millions of young, naive, female baby boomers down with these dysfunctional women, as these “leaders” of radical feminism publicly cursed the loving Christian family unit they hated. The comforting family unit that they never had, and would never, experience.
Lost ladies forever.
Even today, feminists chronically demean happily married ladies for their priorities of husband and children. But what do the feminists offer in return for choosing their lifestyle as a substitute? A self-absorbed, rude, uncooperative, loud-mouthed, sexually liberated existence, as a lonely co-worker? Hmm? Now that’s a difficult choice. And yet, millions of gullible young women continue to choose that path. A path destined to bring nothing but hurt, anger, disappointment and unhappiness into their young lives.
The fact is that being a lady, is taught at home by Christian parents because they love their daughters and want the very best outcome for them. They love their girls and want them safe. Being a lady at the age of 12, 18, 45 or 60 protects women from most of the heartache associated with the troubled lives of the “liberated” women seen prancing, half-naked, along the street.
Christian ladies respect others and are doggedly determined to insist upon that same respect for themselves. No one can break that barrier of self-respect and good Christian men understand, respect and respond to that ideal favorably and honorably.
And not surprisingly, on the other hand, “liberated” feminist females, who behave like obnoxious, drunken sluts, are justifiably treated accordingly.
Ladies also bring beauty into the world, which today is in short supply. They light up a room, sweeten a tedious day and smooth ruffled
feathers. No one can inspire men to life-long devotion, and greatness, like beautiful ladies.
Crystal, silver, china, silk, fur, beautiful flowing clothing, symphonies, elegant furniture, beautiful homes, buildings and cities were created in response to women’s beauty and their innate love of beautiful objects.
Today, everything is grey, boring and bland as these “liberated” “career” women have rejected their traditional roles as purveyors of beautiful homes, and the decorative arts, while devoting their irretrievable youth, time and talent to a “career” with an unappreciative corporation.
These “emancipated” females would rather stomp around a soccer field, curse up a storm at work or hang out at a bar, drinkin’ with the guys, while wearing old jeans and T-shirts!!
Men were never as disrespectful to women as they are to themselves. Why do women allow themselves to be convinced that being female is in some way offensive, and then irrationally force themselves to jettison every shred of their natural femininity? It’s literally insane!
And this ridiculousness certainly didn’t start with the men.
The answer? They allowed themselves to become debased at the behest of lesbian-led, radical feminists who could not stand the joy that traditional Christian relationships, marriages and families provided for their contemporaries. And to offset this strain, these dysfunctional women went after their contemporary’s gullible, innocent, college-bound, baby-boomer children.
This began the demise of femininity as these young women were encouraged to aggressively carve out new turf as “career” women within the world of working men.
In these efforts, they were literally encouraged to become men by their feminist “leaders”, adopting masculine dress, likes and mannerisms, while at the same time, rejecting all things female, including family, children, decorative and culinary arts, fashion and interior design.
And sadly, not only were these gullible young women denied the joy of home life, but as a result of their abandonment of the traditional accoutrements of home, centuries old businesses that have made luxury items for ladies, and their admirers, for hundreds of
years, began to go out of business as well. Many others are struggling to stay alive because today’s “tough girls”, are no longer inspired
with gifts of silver, crystal, artwork, china and beautifully feminine clothes, but instead are purveyors of bare walls, take-out meals, mattress/box spring beds, hand-me-down furniture, baseball hats, sweatshirts and torn jeans!
Sadly, the master craftsmen of Wedgwood and Waterford have disappeared as a result of the blind neglect inflicted by butchy feminists.
Where has women’s self-respect gone? Where’s the respect for themselves as women? Respect and admiration that inspired Western civilization and “launched a thousand ships”? What happened to the concept of high-mindedness and high personal standards of behavior among women? What happened to women?
Thanks to the bazaar rantings of a few disgruntled radical feminists, women no longer value themselves as ladies. They are instead, chronically, and unsuccessfully, trying to be like men. It’s sheer idiocy. And our Christian culture, including Western civilization, is suffering in the wake of this profound loss.
What is wrong with being a lady? Is there something demeaning about being a lady? Is there something offensive about being a lady? The answer is NO!
And the only women who could possibly disagree with this statement are unfortunately still, after 50 years, steering the ship full of women, to hell – the radical, second-wave feminists.
I still don’t understand why young women listen to them!!!??? Are they really, by nature, that foolish? It appears the answer is yes.
Without beautiful ladies, who behave like ladies and love beautiful things, we are losing our sophisticated, civilized society.
Feminism, on the other hand, brings with it annoying women who are consumed by misguided priorities, and are purveyors of nothing but conflict, strife and aggravation. “Liberated” and ” emancipated” anti-Christian radical, second and third-wave feminists, who are at the same time, depleting, defiling and debauching, our Christian culture.
You decide which world you’d prefer to be part of, and then do something about it!
As Christians, you must start to FIGHT BACK, in any capacity you can.
Our future as a good, and beautiful, Christian country depends in it.
It’s the Women, Not the Men to be continued…